And I thought 'expanding one's mind' was part of the agenda
Jun. 2nd, 2026 06:01 pmAnd surely that would include realising that things were not always the exact same way they are today?
This seems so weird to me. I grew up on reading books that had lingered for however long on the shelves of the children's dept of the local public library - which were all bound in that standard hard-wearing public library binding so one did not have any sense of shiny newness or otherwise - along with my mother's old books, some of which were works of a yet more previous generation which she had loved in her youth.
And that's before we get into the oddness of the Alice books and the talking animals and so forth.
Do they have no imaginations? Are they only supposed to identify with recognisable experiences?
Read somewhere about (in this case I think actually adult readers) who could not deal with subtext, foreshadowing, and other Litry Devices.
I was a bit beswozzled by this chap, too, though perhaps from a rather different direction. I devoured classic novels as a teenager. In a world of distractions, can I relearn how to read them?.
Sometimes books have their time and it is past. And sometimes they are just not the right thing at that moment.
And I also think of times in my past when I had fairly long commutes and other stretches of otherwise dead time that I could fill up with doing perhaps rather dutiful reading of those things One Ought To Read, and whether this is not only my experience. And then one's life shifts and these spaces go away.

